VOP ISTRAŽUJE: COK-u za 6 mjeseci POLA MILIONA, Upravi za sport 1,6 miliona, oni ĆUTE o raspodjeli sportistima i klubovima - Volim Podgoricu

VOP ISTRAŽUJE: COK-u za 6 mjeseci POLA MILIONA, Upravi za sport 1,6 miliona, oni ĆUTE o raspodjeli sportistima i klubovima

Optužbe i kontra optužbe na relaciji Ministarstvo prosvete, kulture, nauke i sporta koje vodi ministarka Vesna Bratić i Uprave za sport i mlade, na čijem čelu je do prije par dana bio Vasilije Lalošević, tiču se, osim problema sa Svjetskom antidoping agencijom (WADA), i raspodjele novca sportistima, klubovima i sportskim savezima, što je u nadeležnosti Uprave za sport i mlade.

Lalošević razriješen, Marko Begović v.d. direktora Uprave za sport

Uprava za sport na čijem čelu je bio Lalošević za gotovo dva mjeseca nije odgovorila na pitanja VOP-a u vezi trošenja odnosno raspodjele budžetskog novca namijenjenog sportu. Nisu, čak, ni kurtoazno i elementarno profesionalno odgovorili na mejl koji smo uputili sa adrese Redakcije u prvoj polovini avgusta.

Takođe, ni Crnogorski olimpijski komitet (COK), na čijem čelu je Dušan Simonović nije odgovorio na pitanja koja im je VOP uputio 4. avgusta a tiču se finansiranja sportista učesnika Olimpijskih igara i troškova putovanja na Olimpijske igre u Tokiju, kako sportista tako i nesportskih delegacija.

Iz Vlade su našem portalu, tokom OI, saopštili da su premijer Zdravko Krivokapić i ministar finansija Milojko Spajić, otputovali u sedmodnevni boravak u Tokiju tokom trajanja Olimpijskih igara, o trošku COK-a, te da ne znaju koliko je to koštalo. Taj podatak nismo uspjeli dobiti ni iz COK-a.

KRIVOKAPIĆ I SPAJIĆ VEČERAS LETE ZA TOKIO: U delegaciji još dvije osobe, evo ko snosi troškove

Evropski lideri ZAOBIŠLI Tokio, crnogorski premijer na OI punih 7 dana dok u zemlji “puca po šavovima

Prije nego što je Crnogorski olimpijski komitet (COK) “častio” putovanjem u Tokio premijera i ministra finansija, kao i dvije osobe iz njihovog obezbjeđenja, COK-u je iz budžeta Crne Gore uplaćeno 513.000 eura.

Odgovorajući na pitanja VOP-a iz Ministarstva finansija su naveli da se “sve uplate sportskim savezima, klubovima i pojedincima sprovode preko Uprave za sport i mlade.

Na pitanje, koje smo početkom avgusta proslijedili Ministtarstvu finansija – koliko je novca iz budžeta uplaćeno Crnogorskom olimpijskom komitetu (COK) u toku mandata ove Vlade, precizirali su:

COK-u iz budžeta preko pola miliona

“U 2021. godini za potrebe finansiranja COK-a, a prevashodno u cilju priprema sportista i organizacije puta i boravka na Olimpijskim igrama u Tokiju, odrađene su u tri tranše i to:

* Prva uplata preko USM bila je 24.02.2021. godine i iznosila je 150.000,00 €, na osnovu Zaključka Vlade br. 04-772/2 sa sjednice održane 18. februara 2021. godine na kojoj je usvojena Informacija o potrebi sufinansiranja redovnih programskih aktivnosti sportskih organizacija u I kvartalu 2021. godine;

*Druga uplata preko USM bila je 02.06.2021. godine i iznosila je 135.000,00 €, na osnovu Zaključka Vlade br. 04-2491/2 sa sjednice održane 20. maja 2021. godine na kojoj je usvojena Informacija o potrebi sufinansiranja redovnih programskih aktivnosti sportskih organizacija u II kvartalu 2021. godine;

*Treća uplata je bila preko Ministarstva finansija i socijalnog staranja neposredno pred odlazak crnogorske sportske delegacije na Olimpijske igre u Tokiju i iznosila je 228.000,00 €, na osnovu Zaključka Vlade br. 04-3485/2 sa sjednice održane 15. jula 2021. godine na kojoj je usvojena Informacija o korišćenju sredstava tekuće budžetske rezerve za finansiranje učešća crnogorske delegacije na Olimpijskim igrama u Tokiju;

Navedeni iznosi se odnose na prvo polugođe ove godine, odnosno na period prije odlaska na OI.

Simonović Foto COK

Iz COK-a su, međutim, nakon povratka delegacije sa OI u Tokiju igonorisali pitanja VOP-a o troškovima.

Nismo dobili odgovore na pitanja o raspodjeli novca sportistima, troškovima za učešće na OI, ali ni o tome ko je sve o trošku COK-a putovao u Tokio i koliko je to koštalo.

Upravi za sport za pola godine 1,6 miliona eura 

Istovremeno, Uprava za sport, kako su naveli iz Ministarstva finansija, u prvoj polovini godine uplaćeno je gotovo 1,6 miliona eura.

Lalošević Foto printscreen

LALOŠEVIĆ TVRDI: Glavni krivac za propuste tajni savjetnik Vesne Bratić koga je imenovala na moje mjesto

MPNKS: Imamo pisane dokaze, Lalošević da se pripremi za postupak pred nadležnim organima

“Ministarstvo finansija i socijalnog staranja je u prvoj polovini tekuće godine u periodu privremenog finansiranja, u okviru sredstava opredijeljenih Upravi za sport i mlade, obezbijedilo 1.578.896,08 € koje je uplaćeno sportskim savezima u dvije tranše na osnovu Zaključaka Vlade br. 04-772/2 i br. 04-2491/2”, naveli su iz resora Milojka Spajića.

Na pitanje VOP-a koliko novca je proslijeđeno sportistima i klubovima koji učestvuju na OI direktno iz državnog budžeta i po kom osnovu, iz Ministarstva finansija su kazali da, “kao i u slučaju COK-a, uvid i kontrola svrhe i načina trošenja budžetskih sredstava uplaćenih sportskim savezima je u nadležnosti Uprave za sport i mlade, a oni su dužni da o trošenju istih prilože polugodišnje izvještaje toj Upravi, preko koje je i vršeni transfer novca”.

Iz Ministarstva finansija su VOP-u dostavili i tabelu uplata sportistima, savezima i klubovima, na osnovu dva navedena zaključka Vlade Crne Gore iz februara i maja 2021. godine (iznosi su u eurima i odnose se isplate po zaključcima Vlade). Napomenuli su da su crvenom bojom označeni savezi koji su imali svoje predstavnike na OI, kao i COK koji je, kako navode, kao krovna institucija glavni organizator za put i smještaj crnogorske (sportske) delegacije.

Izvor: Ministarstvo finansija

“Takođe, sve detaljne informacije o tačnim iznosima sredstava opredijeljenih isključivo u cilju pripreme i nastupa sportista na Olimpijskim igrama mogu dati savezi, kao i Uprava za sport i mlade koja od njih dobija polugodišnje izvještaje o načinu trošenja dodijeljenih budžetskih sredstava”, naveli su iz Ministarstva finasija.

I Uprava za sport i mlade ćuti kako troši novac poreskih obveznika  

Kao ni COK, ni Uprava za sport i mlade,  nije dogovorila na pitanja VOP-a o raspodjeli novca sportistima, klubovima i savezima, ali ni na pitanje da li je delegacija Uprave za sport putovala na OI u Tokiju i koliko je to koštalo.

VOP je tokom proteklih mjeseci poslao brojne upite različitim državnim institucijama i ustanovama koji se tiču trošenja novca crnogorskih građana, ali, uglavnom, bez odgovora.

Praksa netransparentnog raspolaganja novcem građana, koju je ustanovio protekli režim, nastavljena je i tokom proteklih godinu dana, tokom vladavine nove vladajuće većine, uprkos neupitnom interesu javnosti i pravu građana da znaju precizno kako i gdje se troši njihov novac.

N.Radojević
V.Mitrović

101 komentara

  1. Pretty nice post, I was doing a google search and your site came up for short sales in Altamonte Springs, FL but anyway, I have thoroughly enjoyed reading it, keep it up!

  2. Teen porn is extremely dangerous to watch. The Rothman study found that high school girls were exposed to various sexual content. They were also less likely than their peers to use condoms in real-life. Teenagers are still susceptible to the dangers that come with sexual activity. Although it is illegal to show porn to minors, they are permitted to view and possess it. It is illegal to show porn to anyone under 18, but it is legal for parents to let their children to view it. Most teen pornography depicts male authority figures catching female subordinates in the act of doing something. The female subordinate can be a student, babysitter, or a child of a friend's. This creates a stigma for sexual activity and makes it difficult for the customer to have a good time. Teen porn's content is not restricted to videos that feature young women sporting tattoos. Many of these videos were created by amateurs and were not intended to be watched by others. A typical teen porn video shows sex between 18 and 19-year-old pornstars. Hardcore porn features scenes of college babes having sex with big dick jocks and muscular frat boys in locker rooms.

  3. Teen porn can be dangerous to watch. The Rothman study found that girls in high school were exposed to various sexual content. They were also less likely than their peers to use condoms in real life. Teenagers are still susceptible to the dangers that come with sexual activity. While it is not legal to show porn to minors, they can be allowed to watch and even possess it. Although it's illegal to show pornography to anyone under 18, it's not illegal for parents to expose their children to it. The majority of teen pornography is of an authority figure of a male who is catching a female subordinate doing something. The female subordinate is often a babysitter, student or a child of a friend's. This creates a feeling of taboo about sex and the forbiddenness of sexual activity, which can in turn cause feelings of guilt for the person who is consuming. Teen porn does not only contain videos of young women with tattoos. Many of the videos are created by amateurs, and are not meant to be seen by the general public. A typical teen porn clip includes sex between 18 and 19-year-old pornstars. Hardcore porn shows college girls having sexual relations in lockers with big dick frat boys or strong jocks.

  4. Teen porn is a risk to watch. In the Rothman study the study, 72 high school girls were exposed to a wide range of sexually explicit content. The study found that their main source of sexual content was teen porn. They were also less likely to use condoms in real life. Nevertheless, teenagers are not protected from the dangers of sexual sex. While it's illegal to show porn to children, minor viewers are not banned from viewing and possessing the porn. It is not legal to show porn to anyone younger than 18, but it is legal for parents to allow their children to watch it. The vast majority of teen pornography features an authority figure of a male who is catching a female subordinate doing something. The female subordinate is often a babysitter, student or friend's child. This creates a stigma for sex and makes it difficult for the consumer to have a good time. Teen porn doesn't just include videos of young women with tattoos. Many of these videos were made by amateurs and were not intended to be watched by other people. A typical teen porn clip includes sex between 18- and 19-year-old pornstars. Hardcore porn features scenes of college girls having sexual sex with big dick, jocks and muscly frat boys in locker rooms.

  5. Teen porn is a risk to watch. The Rothman study found that girls in high school were exposed to a variety of sexual content. They were also less likely to use condoms in real life. Teenagers are still susceptible to the risks associated with sex. While it's not legal to show pornography to children, underage viewers aren't prohibited from watching or possessing the porn. Although it is illegal to show pornography to anyone under 18 years of age, it's not illegal for parents to expose their children to it. The vast majority of teen pornography shows a male authority figure who is catching a female subordinate doing something. This female subordinate is usually a student, a babysitter, or a friend's daughter. This can create a sense of taboo about sex and the forbiddenness of sexual acts that can result in feelings of guilt in the user. The content of teen porn is not limited to videos that feature young women sporting tattoos. Many of these videos were made by amateurs and aren't meant to be seen by anyone else. A typical teen porn video contains sex between 18- and 19-year-old pornstars. Hardcore porn features scenes of college girls having sexual relations with huge dick jocks and muscly frat boys in locker rooms.

  6. Teen porn is a risk to watch. In the Rothman study students from high school were exposed to a variety of sexual content . It was discovered that their primary source of sexual content was teen porn. They were also less likely to use condoms in real life. However, teenagers aren't protected from sexual assaults. While it's not legal to show porn to children, underage viewers are not barred from viewing and possessing the porn. While it's illegal to show pornography to anyone younger than 18 years old, it is not illegal for parents to expose their children to it. The majority of pornographic material for teens depicts male authority figures catching female subordinates who are doing something. The female subordinate is usually an employee, babysitter, or even a friend's child. This creates a stigma around sexuality and makes it hard for the user to have a good time. Teen porn does not just contain videos of young ladies with tattoos. A lot of the videos are created by amateurs, and are not intended to be watched by other people. A typical teen porn video shows sex between 18 to 19-year-old pornstars. Hardcore porn shows college babes having sexual relations in locker rooms with large dick frat boys or strong jocks.

Slične Objave

Back to top button
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com